Home 5 Articles 5 Plugging Current Gaps in Cancer Screening Will Save Lives

Plugging Current Gaps in Cancer Screening Will Save Lives

by | Feb 22, 2022 | Articles, Clinical Diagnostics Insider, Diagnostic Testing and Emerging Technologies, Special Focus-dtet

COVID-19 is the curse that just keeps on giving. Countless numbers of people have put off cancer screenings as a result of the pandemic, and that may lead to a significant increase in cancer-related deaths in the coming years. That is the sobering conclusion of a new report released by the President’s Cancer Panel on Feb. 3. Cancer Screening Underutilization Improvements in early detection and treatment, coupled with reductions in smoking, have prevented an estimated 3.2 million cancer deaths in the US since 1991, according to the report from the panel, which was established in 1971 to monitor the progress of the National Cancer Program (NCP). However, too many people are still dying, with over 600,000 cancer deaths expected in 2021. In addition to the human toll, cancer deaths cost the US over $90 billion per year in lost earnings. One reason that cancer remains a major problem is that screening has been underutilized, both before and during the pandemic. Focusing on the four cancers—breast, cervical, colorectal, and lung—for which the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends screening for eligible individuals, the report describes “significant gaps between recommended screening and screening uptake.” Source: President’s Cancer Panel, “Closing Gaps in […]

COVID-19 is the curse that just keeps on giving. Countless numbers of people have put off cancer screenings as a result of the pandemic, and that may lead to a significant increase in cancer-related deaths in the coming years. That is the sobering conclusion of a new report released by the President’s Cancer Panel on Feb. 3.

Cancer Screening Underutilization

Improvements in early detection and treatment, coupled with reductions in smoking, have prevented an estimated 3.2 million cancer deaths in the US since 1991, according to the report from the panel, which was established in 1971 to monitor the progress of the National Cancer Program (NCP). However, too many people are still dying, with over 600,000 cancer deaths expected in 2021. In addition to the human toll, cancer deaths cost the US over $90 billion per year in lost earnings. One reason that cancer remains a major problem is that screening has been underutilized, both before and during the pandemic. Focusing on the four cancers—breast, cervical, colorectal, and lung—for which the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends screening for eligible individuals, the report describes “significant gaps between recommended screening and screening uptake.”
Cancer TypeOrganizations Issuing Screening Guidelines
BreastAmerican Cancer Society

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

American College of Physicians

American College of Radiology and Society of Breast Imaging

American Society of Breast Surgeons

National Comprehensive Cancer Network

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Cervical
American Cancer Society

American College of Physicians

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
ColorectalAmerican Academy of Family Physicians

American Cancer Society

American College of Gastroenterology

American College of Physicians

National Comprehensive Cancer Network

U.S. Multi-Society Task Force for Colorectal Cancer

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
LungAmerican Academy of Family Physicians

American Association for Thoracic Surgery

American Cancer Society

American College of Chest Physicians

National Comprehensive Cancer Network

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Source: President’s Cancer Panel, “Closing Gaps in Cancer Screening.” The report notes that the table may not be comprehensive.
Rates are particularly low for lung cancer, partly because screening has only been recommended since 2013. Colorectal cancer screening has increased in recent years, but gaps remain. While screening rates for breast and cervical cancer have risen, they have plateaued in the past 20 years. In addition, the report notes, many people at high risk for cancer due to their personal or family history are not being identified or offered appropriate high-risk screening.
Graph showing US cancer screening rates for various cancers from 1987 to 2022

Source: President’s Cancer Panel, “Closing Gaps in Cancer Screening.” The report notes that the table may not be comprehensive. *More specifics can be found in the report.

Cancer Screening During the Pandemic

Not surprisingly, the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the problems. Cancer screening plummeted in the spring of 2020 when many health care services had to be suspended and people were ordered to stay at home. Many within the cancer community expressed concerns that delayed and missed diagnoses would result in nearly 10,000 excess breast and colorectal cancers in the US over the next 10 years. While screening has resumed, the report notes that rates continue to fluctuate and remain below pre-pandemic rates. The report says that the pandemic provides four lessons about cancer screening:
  • Cancer screening is an essential health care service and should not be delayed or forgone except when the risks clearly outweigh benefits;
  • Clear and accurate communication is necessary to guide screening during health care system disruptions;
  • High-risk individuals should be identified and prioritized when screening capacity is limited; and
  • Telehealth and self-collection may enable screening for certain cancers with minimal physical contact with health care settings.

The Panel’s 4 Recommendations

The Bottom Line: Cancers are not being detected and treated early and people are unnecessarily dying or enduring aggressive treatment that screening could have prevented. The report notes that this has a disproportionate impact on people of color and other socially and economically disadvantaged populations, as well as those at genetically elevated risk of cancer. For the panel, more robust screening is the key to resolving the cancer problem. The report says that the NCP has a “significant opportunity” to “accelerate the decline in cancer deaths” and further early cancer detection and removal of precancerous lesions by promoting more effective and equitable implementation of cancer screening. The panel sets out four broad sets of goals for the NCP to pursue to close the current screening gaps:
  1. Improve and Align Cancer Screening Communication

General awareness of and belief in cancer screening in the US is high but the public and providers “need accurate, digestible, and actionable information.” Recommended actions:
  • Conduct large- and small-scale communications campaigns; and
  • Create and expand National Cancer Roundtables to address screening gaps.
  1. Promote Equitable Access to Cancer Screening

One reason for current cancer screening gaps is inadequate access to health care services due to geographic, financial, or logistical challenges. Other factors that may deter people from seeking or receiving screening include fear of judgment, apprehension about potential diagnoses, cultural norms, mistrust of doctors or health care systems, and structural racism. Recommended actions:
  • Provide and sustainably fund community-oriented outreach and support services to promote appropriate screening and follow-up care; and
  • Increase access to self-sampling for cancer screening. 
  1. Bolster Collaborations between Cancer Screening and Cancer Risk Assessment

Individual providers cannot do everything by themselves. Team-based care offers the potential to improve cancer screening. Recommended actions:
  • Empower health care team members to support screening, such as by expanding Medicare and Medicaid coverage requirements so that a wider array of providers can support cancer screening for their patients; and
  • Expand access to genetic testing and counseling for cancer risk assessment.
  1. Create Health Information Technology that Promotes Cancer Screening

Cancer screening is particularly well suited to benefit from health IT tools, including via the establishment of computable guidelines, i.e., putting health guidelines in a format that software applications understand, and clinical decision support (CDS) that enables providers and patients to quickly determine what care to recommend based on patient-specific factors. Recommended actions:
  • Create computable versions of cancer screening and risk assessment guidelines; and
  • Create and deploy effective CDS tools for cancer risk assessment and screening.

Presidential Cancer Panel Calls on Payors to Loosen the Reins on Genetic Testing

Current cancer screening guidelines target populations at average risk, rather than people at elevated risk due to personal or family history or mutations in cancer susceptibility genes. But while demand for hereditary cancer genetic testing has increased, some insurers now require consultation with a certified genetic counselor or geneticist before testing to minimize inappropriate utilization. The President’s Cancer Panel criticizes this practice for creating “an unnecessary barrier that results in fewer appropriate tests performed and longer turnaround times” that disproportionately affects racial/ethnic minorities. Providers should be able to offer genetic testing with informed consent without pretest counseling, the panel says. In addition to optimizing patient access to appropriate genetic testing and supplemental screening, eliminating the pretest gatekeeper will enable certified genetic counselors to focus on patients with the greatest needs.

Subscribe to Clinical Diagnostics Insider to view

Start a Free Trial for immediate access to this article